123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402403404405406407408409410411412413414415416417418419420421422423424425426427428429430431432433434435436437438439440441442443444445446447448449450451452453454455456457458459460461462463464465466467468469470471472473474475476477478479480481482483484485486487488489490491492493494495496497498499500501502503504505506507508509510511512513514515516517518519520521522523524525526527528529530531532533534535536537538539540541542543544545546547548549550551552553554555556557558559560561562563564565566567568569570571572573574575576577578579580581582583584585586587588589590591592593594595596597598599600601602603604605606607608609610611612613614615616617618619620621622623624625626627628629630631632633634635636637638639640641642643644645646647648649650651652653654655656657658659660661662663664665666667668669670671672673674675676677678679680681682683684685686687688689690691692693694695696697698699700701702703704705706707708709710711712713714715716717718719720721722723724725726727728729730731732733734735736737738739740741742743744745746747748749750751752753754755756757758759760761762763764765766767768769770771772773774775776777778779780781782783784785786787 |
- 2025-01-14 17:32:08,157 INFO Starting Nacos v1.2.1 on 35b64930e042 with PID 50 (/home/nacos/target/nacos-server.jar started by root in /home/nacos)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:08,160 INFO The following profiles are active: standalone
- 2025-01-14 17:32:09,823 INFO Bean 'org.springframework.security.config.annotation.configuration.ObjectPostProcessorConfiguration' of type [org.springframework.security.config.annotation.configuration.ObjectPostProcessorConfiguration$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$67a503f8] is not eligible for getting processed by all BeanPostProcessors (for example: not eligible for auto-proxying)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:09,954 INFO Bean 'objectPostProcessor' of type [org.springframework.security.config.annotation.configuration.AutowireBeanFactoryObjectPostProcessor] is not eligible for getting processed by all BeanPostProcessors (for example: not eligible for auto-proxying)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:09,961 INFO Bean 'org.springframework.security.access.expression.method.DefaultMethodSecurityExpressionHandler@4bdeaabb' of type [org.springframework.security.access.expression.method.DefaultMethodSecurityExpressionHandler] is not eligible for getting processed by all BeanPostProcessors (for example: not eligible for auto-proxying)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:09,963 INFO Bean 'org.springframework.security.config.annotation.method.configuration.GlobalMethodSecurityConfiguration' of type [org.springframework.security.config.annotation.method.configuration.GlobalMethodSecurityConfiguration$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$8c79a6aa] is not eligible for getting processed by all BeanPostProcessors (for example: not eligible for auto-proxying)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:09,968 INFO Bean 'methodSecurityMetadataSource' of type [org.springframework.security.access.method.DelegatingMethodSecurityMetadataSource] is not eligible for getting processed by all BeanPostProcessors (for example: not eligible for auto-proxying)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:10,541 INFO Tomcat initialized with port(s): 8848 (http)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:10,575 INFO Starting service [Tomcat]
- 2025-01-14 17:32:10,576 INFO Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/9.0.13
- 2025-01-14 17:32:10,598 INFO The APR based Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal performance in production environments was not found on the java.library.path: [/usr/java/packages/lib/amd64:/usr/lib64:/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib]
- 2025-01-14 17:32:10,711 INFO Initializing Spring embedded WebApplicationContext
- 2025-01-14 17:32:10,712 INFO Root WebApplicationContext: initialization completed in 2498 ms
- 2025-01-14 17:32:10,984 INFO Use Mysql as the driver
- 2025-01-14 17:32:19,667 INFO Reflections took 29 ms to scan 1 urls, producing 6 keys and 24 values
- 2025-01-14 17:32:19,690 INFO Reflections took 2 ms to scan 1 urls, producing 2 keys and 12 values
- 2025-01-14 17:32:19,695 INFO Reflections took 2 ms to scan 1 urls, producing 3 keys and 15 values
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,064 WARN Exception encountered during context initialization - cancelling refresh attempt: org.springframework.beans.factory.UnsatisfiedDependencyException: Error creating bean with name 'opsController' defined in URL [jar:file:/home/nacos/target/nacos-server.jar!/BOOT-INF/lib/nacos-config-1.2.1.jar!/com/alibaba/nacos/config/server/controller/OpsController.class]: Unsatisfied dependency expressed through constructor parameter 1; nested exception is org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean with name 'dumpService': Invocation of init method failed; nested exception is java.lang.RuntimeException: Nacos Server did not start because dumpservice bean construction failure :
- No DataSource set
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,069 INFO Stopping service [Tomcat]
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,072 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [Abandoned connection cleanup thread] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:144)
- com.mysql.jdbc.AbandonedConnectionCleanupThread.run(AbandonedConnectionCleanupThread.java:43)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,072 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.server.Timer-0] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1088)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,073 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.server.Timer-1] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,074 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.timer] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1088)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,074 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [nacos.naming.status.worker] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,075 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.raft.notifier] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.persistent.raft.RaftCore$Notifier.run(RaftCore.java:942)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,075 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.timer] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1088)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,076 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.timer] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1088)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,076 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.timer] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1088)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,076 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.timer] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1088)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,077 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.server.list.notifier] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1081)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,077 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.timer] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,078 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.data.syncer] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,078 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,079 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,079 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,080 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,080 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,081 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,081 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,081 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,082 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,082 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,083 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,083 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,084 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,084 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,085 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,085 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,086 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,086 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,087 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,087 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,088 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,088 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,089 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,089 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,089 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,090 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,090 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,091 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.task.dispatcher] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.poll(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:467)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.TaskDispatcher$TaskScheduler.run(TaskDispatcher.java:94)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,091 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.timer] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1088)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,092 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.distro.notifier] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:442)
- com.alibaba.nacos.naming.consistency.ephemeral.distro.DistroConsistencyServiceImpl$Notifier.run(DistroConsistencyServiceImpl.java:380)
- java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
- java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,092 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.timer] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1088)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,093 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.timer] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1088)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,094 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.timer] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1088)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,095 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.naming.timer] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1088)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,095 WARN The web application [nacos] appears to have started a thread named [com.alibaba.nacos.server.Timer-3] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. Stack trace of thread:
- sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
- java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1088)
- java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
- java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
- java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,100 INFO Nacos logs files: /home/nacos/logs/
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,101 INFO Nacos conf files: /home/nacos/conf/
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,101 INFO Nacos data files: /home/nacos/data/
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,101 ERROR Nacos failed to start, please see /home/nacos/logs/nacos.log for more details.
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,107 INFO
- Error starting ApplicationContext. To display the conditions report re-run your application with 'debug' enabled.
- 2025-01-14 17:32:20,110 ERROR Application run failed
- org.springframework.beans.factory.UnsatisfiedDependencyException: Error creating bean with name 'opsController' defined in URL [jar:file:/home/nacos/target/nacos-server.jar!/BOOT-INF/lib/nacos-config-1.2.1.jar!/com/alibaba/nacos/config/server/controller/OpsController.class]: Unsatisfied dependency expressed through constructor parameter 1; nested exception is org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean with name 'dumpService': Invocation of init method failed; nested exception is java.lang.RuntimeException: Nacos Server did not start because dumpservice bean construction failure :
- No DataSource set
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.ConstructorResolver.createArgumentArray(ConstructorResolver.java:769)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.ConstructorResolver.autowireConstructor(ConstructorResolver.java:218)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.autowireConstructor(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1308)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBeanInstance(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1154)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:538)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:498)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.lambda$doGetBean$0(AbstractBeanFactory.java:320)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:222)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:318)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.getBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:199)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultListableBeanFactory.preInstantiateSingletons(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:846)
- at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.finishBeanFactoryInitialization(AbstractApplicationContext.java:863)
- at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:546)
- at org.springframework.boot.web.servlet.context.ServletWebServerApplicationContext.refresh(ServletWebServerApplicationContext.java:142)
- at org.springframework.boot.SpringApplication.refresh(SpringApplication.java:775)
- at org.springframework.boot.SpringApplication.refreshContext(SpringApplication.java:397)
- at org.springframework.boot.SpringApplication.run(SpringApplication.java:316)
- at org.springframework.boot.SpringApplication.run(SpringApplication.java:1260)
- at org.springframework.boot.SpringApplication.run(SpringApplication.java:1248)
- at com.alibaba.nacos.Nacos.main(Nacos.java:35)
- at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
- at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
- at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
- at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
- at org.springframework.boot.loader.MainMethodRunner.run(MainMethodRunner.java:48)
- at org.springframework.boot.loader.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:87)
- at org.springframework.boot.loader.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:50)
- at org.springframework.boot.loader.PropertiesLauncher.main(PropertiesLauncher.java:593)
- Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean with name 'dumpService': Invocation of init method failed; nested exception is java.lang.RuntimeException: Nacos Server did not start because dumpservice bean construction failure :
- No DataSource set
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.InitDestroyAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.postProcessBeforeInitialization(InitDestroyAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.java:139)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.applyBeanPostProcessorsBeforeInitialization(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:419)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.initializeBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1737)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:576)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:498)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.lambda$doGetBean$0(AbstractBeanFactory.java:320)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:222)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:318)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.getBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:199)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.config.DependencyDescriptor.resolveCandidate(DependencyDescriptor.java:273)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultListableBeanFactory.doResolveDependency(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:1237)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultListableBeanFactory.resolveDependency(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:1164)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.ConstructorResolver.resolveAutowiredArgument(ConstructorResolver.java:857)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.ConstructorResolver.createArgumentArray(ConstructorResolver.java:760)
- ... 27 common frames omitted
- Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Nacos Server did not start because dumpservice bean construction failure :
- No DataSource set
- at com.alibaba.nacos.config.server.service.dump.DumpService.init(DumpService.java:142)
- at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
- at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
- at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
- at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.InitDestroyAnnotationBeanPostProcessor$LifecycleElement.invoke(InitDestroyAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.java:363)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.InitDestroyAnnotationBeanPostProcessor$LifecycleMetadata.invokeInitMethods(InitDestroyAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.java:307)
- at org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.InitDestroyAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.postProcessBeforeInitialization(InitDestroyAnnotationBeanPostProcessor.java:136)
- ... 40 common frames omitted
- 2025-01-14 17:33:51,947 INFO Starting Nacos v1.2.1 on e9cbfdbd1a32 with PID 50 (/home/nacos/target/nacos-server.jar started by root in /home/nacos)
- 2025-01-14 17:33:51,949 INFO The following profiles are active: standalone
- 2025-01-14 17:33:53,391 INFO Bean 'org.springframework.security.config.annotation.configuration.ObjectPostProcessorConfiguration' of type [org.springframework.security.config.annotation.configuration.ObjectPostProcessorConfiguration$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$43dbdb21] is not eligible for getting processed by all BeanPostProcessors (for example: not eligible for auto-proxying)
- 2025-01-14 17:33:53,477 INFO Bean 'objectPostProcessor' of type [org.springframework.security.config.annotation.configuration.AutowireBeanFactoryObjectPostProcessor] is not eligible for getting processed by all BeanPostProcessors (for example: not eligible for auto-proxying)
- 2025-01-14 17:33:53,480 INFO Bean 'org.springframework.security.access.expression.method.DefaultMethodSecurityExpressionHandler@5965d37' of type [org.springframework.security.access.expression.method.DefaultMethodSecurityExpressionHandler] is not eligible for getting processed by all BeanPostProcessors (for example: not eligible for auto-proxying)
- 2025-01-14 17:33:53,481 INFO Bean 'org.springframework.security.config.annotation.method.configuration.GlobalMethodSecurityConfiguration' of type [org.springframework.security.config.annotation.method.configuration.GlobalMethodSecurityConfiguration$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$68b07dd3] is not eligible for getting processed by all BeanPostProcessors (for example: not eligible for auto-proxying)
- 2025-01-14 17:33:53,487 INFO Bean 'methodSecurityMetadataSource' of type [org.springframework.security.access.method.DelegatingMethodSecurityMetadataSource] is not eligible for getting processed by all BeanPostProcessors (for example: not eligible for auto-proxying)
- 2025-01-14 17:33:53,978 INFO Tomcat initialized with port(s): 8848 (http)
- 2025-01-14 17:33:54,005 INFO Starting service [Tomcat]
- 2025-01-14 17:33:54,005 INFO Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/9.0.13
- 2025-01-14 17:33:54,018 INFO The APR based Apache Tomcat Native library which allows optimal performance in production environments was not found on the java.library.path: [/usr/java/packages/lib/amd64:/usr/lib64:/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib]
- 2025-01-14 17:33:54,079 INFO Initializing Spring embedded WebApplicationContext
- 2025-01-14 17:33:54,079 INFO Root WebApplicationContext: initialization completed in 2091 ms
- 2025-01-14 17:33:54,343 INFO Use Mysql as the driver
- 2025-01-14 17:33:55,085 INFO Reflections took 27 ms to scan 1 urls, producing 6 keys and 24 values
- 2025-01-14 17:33:55,108 INFO Reflections took 2 ms to scan 1 urls, producing 2 keys and 12 values
- 2025-01-14 17:33:55,114 INFO Reflections took 2 ms to scan 1 urls, producing 3 keys and 15 values
- 2025-01-14 17:33:55,736 INFO Initializing ExecutorService 'applicationTaskExecutor'
- 2025-01-14 17:33:55,879 INFO Adding welcome page: class path resource [static/index.html]
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,077 INFO Creating filter chain: Ant [pattern='/**'], []
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,098 INFO Creating filter chain: any request, [org.springframework.security.web.context.request.async.WebAsyncManagerIntegrationFilter@79145d5a, org.springframework.security.web.context.SecurityContextPersistenceFilter@b78a709, org.springframework.security.web.header.HeaderWriterFilter@183e8023, org.springframework.security.web.csrf.CsrfFilter@63b1d4fa, org.springframework.security.web.authentication.logout.LogoutFilter@a776e, org.springframework.security.web.savedrequest.RequestCacheAwareFilter@2a3c96e3, org.springframework.security.web.servletapi.SecurityContextHolderAwareRequestFilter@cb191ca, org.springframework.security.web.authentication.AnonymousAuthenticationFilter@1f2f9244, org.springframework.security.web.session.SessionManagementFilter@3e5499cc, org.springframework.security.web.access.ExceptionTranslationFilter@201b6b6f]
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,152 INFO Exposing 2 endpoint(s) beneath base path '/actuator'
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,178 INFO Initializing ExecutorService 'taskScheduler'
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,339 INFO Tomcat started on port(s): 8848 (http) with context path '/nacos'
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,344 INFO Started Nacos in 5.181 seconds (JVM running for 5.737)
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,345 INFO Nacos logs files: /home/nacos/logs/
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,345 INFO Nacos conf files: /home/nacos/conf/
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,345 INFO Nacos data files: /home/nacos/data/
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,346 INFO Nacos started successfully in stand alone mode.
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,479 INFO Initializing Spring DispatcherServlet 'dispatcherServlet'
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,480 INFO Initializing Servlet 'dispatcherServlet'
- 2025-01-14 17:33:56,485 INFO Completed initialization in 5 ms
|